Talk:Industrial hip hop
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Industrial hip hop article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Redirect
editThis page is almost completly Or and should be redirect to idustrial music. One of the two sources is misqouted in the article and mentions nothing about industrial hip-hop. 66.222.253.33 (talk) 01:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- I strongly disagree. The article is in need of additional sources, like many articles on Wikipedia. That's not a good reason to delete it. You can put a "notability" tag on it, or put it through an AFD, if you feel that's necessary. One source manifestly *does* discuss industrial hip-hop, and it's clearly distinct from industrial music. Aryder779 (talk) 22:59, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- I've added multiple additional sources, so I don't think the notability or existence of the subject is in question. Aryder779 (talk) 02:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
I read the article, saw the sources, and still agree that Wikipedia should get rid of this page, or redirect it to industrial music. The notability and existence of so called 'industrial hip-hop' is very much in question by both the purist industrial and broader industrial circles on the net. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.57.254.33 (talk) 17:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
It needs a rewrite, Consolidated were far more important than the "also important" mentire. They were on their third album by the time Mark Pistel produced the Disposable Heroes. Donnacha (talk) 23:58, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Industrial hip hop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722021642/http://grapevine.is/Home/ReadArticle/Fuck-Fuck-Fuck-Iceland-Airwaves-is-Coming-Again to http://grapevine.is/Home/ReadArticle/Fuck-Fuck-Fuck-Iceland-Airwaves-is-Coming-Again
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100415120733/http://www.planetrock-booking.de/press/faust/faust_englisch.pdf to http://www.planetrock-booking.de/press/faust/faust_englisch.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080306005311/http://www.revolvermag.com/content/nine-inch-nails-release-album-online to http://www.revolvermag.com/content/nine-inch-nails-release-album-online
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)