Talk:Ineos
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ineos article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Comments
editI don't intend to stand up for Ineos, they are big and ugly enough to speak for themselves! However, some of the information regarding the Unite dispute is a bit iffy. It was estimated that the final salary pension scheme would cost £16M per annum to continue - should be remembered that this is the cost as of that specific day - if the returns on investments went down (as they have, significantly since that time) then the company would need to pump in a lot more than £16M. I would also point out that saying that the Grangemouth facility makes "up to £3M a day" in profit is somewhat ambiguous. Firstly "up to £3M" simply means "not more than £3M" which could mean that some days it actually makes a loss! You would need to look at the actual annual profit and then take a view on how that is likely to progress over the next 20 years or so. It is also not clear whether the "up to £3M profit" is gross margin, delivered margin or operating margin. It does make quite a difference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.198.33.252 (talk) 13:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Head Office / Registered Office
editCan anybody please explain this? Which one is the legal headquarters, which the operative headquarters? If I understand this right 'registered office' means the legal headquarters, right...?
193.192.244.44 (talk) 12:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- 'Registered office' is not a headquarters per se but the address at which the ultimate holding company is registered.Rangoon11 (talk) 16:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Public Controversy about INEOS activities
editRecent articles and studies made by NGOs have revealed informations about INEOS. Should it be included in this article ?
Examples among others : https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/apr/03/ineos-leads-lobbying-effort-to-get-out-of-paying-green-tax https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/insight/ineos-chequered-environmental-track-record-europe https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/insight/chemical-billionaires-bid-fossil-fuel-empire-ineos-corporate-profile
There have also been articles on the links between Ineos and the Paradise Papers? http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/15670165.Exposed__Ineos_links_to_Paradise_Papers_firm/
I have the feeling that this could be included in the article to make it more balanced.
--Tifeco76 (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
The foodandwaterwatch.org articles are no longer available Sadgrove (talk) 10:12, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Conflict of interest tag
editI think this tag refers to User talk:Chemicals are life. As he/she has not edited the article since 9 Sep 2016, is it OK if I remove the tag? Mock wurzel soup (talk) 21:15, 31 October 2019 (UTC)