Talk:Infante Francisco, Duke of Beja
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
File:Coat of Arms of the Most Serene and Royal House of Braganza.gif Nominated for Deletion
edit
|
An image used in this article, File:Coat of Arms of the Most Serene and Royal House of Braganza.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Coat of Arms of the Most Serene and Royal House of Braganza.gif) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2012 (UTC) |
Requested move 2012
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:11, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Infante Francis, Duke of Beja → Francisco, Duke of Beja – The present title is unnecesarry. The suffix of Infante is not at all logical or used here on wiki. He has a a named title and thus does not need the Infante suffix to distinguish him. Thank you, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 04:13, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Goes against conventions set by the titles of other Portuguese infantes and Spanish infantes. I would agree to the dropping of the title infante if it was a medieval infante when the title infante was less established and their ducal titles had more power behind them. Cristiano Tomás could you respond to Talk:Infante of Portugal.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 06:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- We usually add the Infant in order to show royalty or give distinction, but in the article title he is already shown to have his own noble title, and the infante just lengthens it and is unecessary for the article title, but it should be in the article lead. Thank you, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 06:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Cristiano, it should be changed from "Francis" to "Francisco". --Lecen (talk) 17:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, that is what I propose, alongside the drop of the "Infante". Thank you, Cristiano Tomás (talk)
- But you must understand that royals who are not monarchs or concorts either have "prince" or "infante" before their names in their titles. See Prince Gaston, Count of Eu or Infante Francisco de Paula of Spain. --Lecen (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose, per Lecen. He's a royal duke, and "Infante" makes that clear. FactStraight (talk) 22:49, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Requested move 2013
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:44, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Infante Francis, Duke of Beja → Infante Francisco, Duke of Beja – I am currently revising the article on King João V, and this Infante is frequently mentioned in many of my sources. All the sources that refer to the Infante all refer to him as Francisco, and I have yet to find a single source that calls him Francis. I plan on expanding and turning this stub into a real article, but I find that I should start its reform with its article name. I appreciate all input and rationale, thank you, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 06:31, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support - neither get anything in GB, but [beja "1691 1742"] makes it clear his name is Francisco not Francis. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Infante Francisco, Duke of Beja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140407071812/http://macgregor-sadolin.com/genealogy/getperson.php?personID=I24196&tree=tree1 to http://macgregor-sadolin.com/genealogy/getperson.php?personID=I24196&tree=tree1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)