Talk:Inferno (Counter-Strike)/GA1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Vacant0 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 12:15, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


Hi, I'll be reviewing this GAN as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. --Vacant0 (talk) 12:15, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Initial comments

edit
  •   There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 4.8% in similarity.
  •   There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
  •   The article is stable. There has not been any edit warring in the recent period.
  •   No previous GA reviews.

General comments

edit
  •   Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
    • No problems were found in the lede.
    • No problems were found in the rest of the article.
  •   Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
    • Add alt texts to images.
    • Add wikilinks to Counter-Strike 2 in the lede.
    • Add wikilinks to Dust II, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Counter-Strike 2, and Gabriel "FalleN" Toledo in the body.
    • "March of 2023' → March 2023
    • The article complies with the MOS:LEDE, MOS:LAYOUT, MOS:WTW, and MOS:WAF guidelines. The article has no embedded lists, so I am skipping MOS:EMBED.
  •   Checking ref, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
    • References section with a {{reflist}} template is now present in the article.
    • No referencing issues.
    • Listed references are reliable, they are mostly news websites.
      • Ref 30 does not have access date and pages listed.
      • Design: "Due to Inferno's amount of paths, there are many locations where conflict can arise, though some experience more conflict than others, such as the maps choke points." is unsourced.
    • Spotchecked Ref 1, 2, 4, 9, 11, 16, 23, 29, 32–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
    • Copyvio already checked.
  •   Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
    • Design: Alt. Middle is also known as Second Middle, so if there are any sources that describe this location as Second Middle, you should add it to the article. There are also two more easter eggs that you should add: the Counter-Strike 1.1 main menu in the Terrorist Apps and the Grenate Graffiti in Pit.
    • Besides this, the article looks good. Passes this criteria.
  •   Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
    • The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
  •   Checking whether the article is stable.
    • As noted in the initial comments, there has not been any edit warring in the recent period.
  •   Checking images.
    • All looks good, images are properly licensed.

Final comments

edit

@NegativeMP1: There are not too many issues you'll have to fix so I'll put the article on hold for a week. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 13:27, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

All of these issues should be addressed, though two things I should mention:
  1. I was unable to find a source that mentioned the Counter-Strike 1.1 menu Easter egg, so I didn't add it. A mention of the Graffiti Easter egg has been added, though.
  2. Couldn't figure out how to add the access date and pages to the Cite thesis template, so I just typed them manually in the reference itself. Hopefully that works well enough.
NegativeMP1 (talk) 18:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
That's alright. The maps in the thesis were cited on page 4, so I've corrected that. Passing this article, good job. Vacant0 (talk) 18:45, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.