Talk:Infernus

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

rape charges

edit

Why is there a citation needed it is standing on the offical sie from Gorgoroth ( www.gorgoroth.org ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.126.63.3 (talk) 19:31, February 15, 2007 (UTC)

Accepted. Mea culpa. Alexander Iwaschkin 22:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
I have removed this information per WP:BLP. I can not find this documentation, and in any case it would need to accompany the text itself as a footnote. When this is done, sure, add it back into the article. __meco 20:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

beliefs

edit

Does anyone have any source citations for either Inferuns' of Gaahl's beliefs? The documentary "true norwegian metal" makes Gaahl out to seem like a bona-fide Satanist, or at least the beliefs he espouses are very much in tune with the doctrine, plus he says the purpose of his band is to spread the message of Satan. This doesn't necessarily mean that he isn't a Norse pagan as well, but I wouldn't deny him the label of a true Satanist either. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyddiechu (talkcontribs) 21:38, July 30, 2007

Gaahl just uses Satanism as an aversion against Christianity. That statement in "True Norwegian Black Metal" is a misconception on behalf on Peter Beste. Infernus was the one who declared Gorgoroth's goal to promote Satan, not neccessarily Gaahl. However, Gaahl certainly promotes the concept of the superman. (It should be noted that while Infernus is into Nietzsche, he also rejects the beliefset of COS in favour of theistic satanism (though his satanism seems largely obscure), and Gaahl curiously does not cite Nietzsche on the "superman" terminology) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.200.228.66 (talk) 22:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)(Dark Prime)Reply

There is no citation of Infernus being a devil-worshipper. I have removed this; unless you can find a source, keep it out.12.96.46.209 15:57, 22 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • I have only labelled Infernus a Theistic Satanist on a broader basis; that he said he believed in 'some sort of god'. As far as I know he has never explicitly outline his form of Satanism, thus I've never reffered to him as a devil worshipper - Dark Prime, 19:27, 27th October 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.12.243.90 (talk) 18:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

removal

edit
 

I have removed material from this article that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.

Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Docg 23:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I am reinserting the material as it was reliably sourced until someone (namely Therumcove, unless it was someone else) came along and proceeded with uneccessary disruptive editing. I think it would be good to draw a line between wikipedia etiquette and adequate knowledge of the subject at hand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark Prime (talkcontribs) 11:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Move to Infernus?

edit
Support move to Infernus, per Bulgakoff. ≈ The Haunted Angel 14:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
    • Your description of him as a 'routine pop musician' seems to imply that not only does he make pop music (that is, mainstream music in like acts such as S-Club 7, Steps, I don't know who) but that like the aforementioned acts he expects to enjoy a mainstream breakthrough. While no such feats are usually accomplished by black metal musicians, their standings are usually plain and unwavering, as has been for at least the past four-five years if not sixteen. The GTA car doesn't appear to be that prominent given how I've seen it being in lists etc., while I suppose the submarine is still in a nascent stage to decide on a disambiguation page or else. Dark Prime (talk) 16:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Infernus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Infernus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply