Talk:Influenza A virus subtype H3N2
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Original research by anon moved here from article space
edit"The eponymous Hong Kong Flu did not affect local Hongkongers as seriously as it did worldwide. According to local medical workers who witnessed the pandemic, the number of patients visiting the emergency ward peaked to record levels in a very short period, and the number of case records dropped just as abruptly, in a few days' time. It was hypothesised that the majority of Hongkongers are either genetically resistant to this particular strain, or are in possession of antibodies due to previous exposures to avian viruses."
H3N2 detected alongide H1N1 in current H1N1 outbreak
editMight want to put a link on this page to the H1N1 outbreak page 151.194.17.27 (talk) 01:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC) Cilantro and green juice containing green apple, broccoli, and pineapple blended together., taking before breakfast and before bedtime seems to have worked wonders for me against allergies and colds.in the last couple of years. Viruses like cold and flu causes excessive toxins. Reducing toxins may give your body time to fight back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.92.105.160 (talk) 21:08, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Hong Kong Flu needs a new article...
edit...especially after the most recent scare, and considering the fact over a million died. 71.124.143.122 (talk) 22:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with this, it seems noteworthy enough, it could probably be expanded out and made into a coherent article.Compoundinterestisboring (talk) 13:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed: A notable event in history - my school was closed down for it. So let it be written, so let it be done... Dinkytown 21:36, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Agree. Let's get this started. Noble-savage (talk) 22:30, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Agree. This should really have its own article. 82.32.8.154 (talk) 10:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Agree. I just came here expecting to be able to link to an article on the Hong Kong flu and found it buried in an article about a virus that few could name. Anything that can kill a million people needs an article. 12:33 UTC, 12 Jun 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.85.14 (talk) 12:26, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Articles do not write themselves. Don't delete anything in this article, but copy what parts you wish to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hong_Kong_flu&action=edit and expand it. Then you will have your article. WAS 4.250 (talk) 16:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- I agree! With the swine flu, people will want to look up past pandemics. This could ease fear, as well, because it was not the Spanish Flu!::: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.155.180.20 (talk) 01:39, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Original research by anon moved here from article space
edit"The eponymous Hong Kong Flu did not affect local Hongkongers as seriously as it did worldwide. According to local medical workers who witnessed the pandemic, the number of patients visiting the emergency ward peaked to record levels in a very short period, and the number of case records dropped just as abruptly, in a few days' time. It was hypothesised that the majority of Hongkongers are either genetically resistant to this particular strain, or are in possession of antibodies due to previous exposures to avian viruses."
H3N2 detected alongide H1N1 in current H1N1 outbreak
editMight want to put a link on this page to the H1N1 outbreak page 151.194.17.27 (talk) 01:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Sydney Strain
editWhat about the Sydney Strain of H3N2 that appeared in the late 90's? I remember this being quite a bad strain, which was quite widespread and probably deserves a mention here.
Yearly deaths in the US
editThe 36,000 deaths per year are from a CDC study. CDC itself prefers the numbers from a later study, released August 27, 2010. Link and cites follow.
http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/us_flu-related_deaths.htm
"How do the new estimates compare with the 36,000 figure that is often cited as an estimate of annual flu-associated deaths? The 36,000 estimate was presented in a 2003 study by CDC scientists [...] CDC believes that the range of deaths over the past 31 years (~3,000 to ~49,000) is a more accurate representation of the unpredictability and variability of flu-associated deaths."
The line "H3N2 is increasingly abundant in seasonal influenza, which kills an estimated 36,000 people in the United States each year" might be perhaps changed to something like "H3N2, which is typically associated with a higher death rate, is increasingly abundant in seasonal influenza which, from 1976 to 2007, has killed an estimated 3,000 to 49,000 each year, in the United States", plus link to the CDC page.
Another point (should it be by itself?). At the CDC page, "over the past 31 years" is an error; it obviously refers to the 1976-2007 period, not to the 31 years preceding 2010, when the report came out. I've observed relative time periods mentioned in this article as well (next season, past ten years, last year). Shouldn't they be converted to absolutes?
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Influenza A virus subtype H3N2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727011806/http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/Timeline_28_10a.pdf to http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/Timeline_28_10a.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/recommendations2007north/en/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Influenza A virus subtype H3N2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090919154025/http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/vaccine_north2008_9/en/index1.html to http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/vaccine_north2008_9/en/index1.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080521063223/http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/recommended_compositionFeb08FullReport.pdf to http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/recommended_compositionFeb08FullReport.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC)