Talk:Information Security Forum
This article was nominated for deletion on 13 November 2023. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comments
editCan someone please explain to me why this was tagged as being "like an advertisement", especially with no discussion here of why that might be?
71.185.192.226 01:54, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Still no comments debate...I can understand the citations flag, but not the advertising flag, which I'm going to remove unless justified...
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Information Security Forum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141018220906/https://www.securityforum.org/tools/sogp/ to https://www.securityforum.org/tools/sogp/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141018222734/https://www.securityforum.org/events/isf-annual-world-congress/ to https://www.securityforum.org/events/isf-annual-world-congress/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141018220958/https://www.securityforum.org/membership/isflive/ to https://www.securityforum.org/membership/isflive/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 7 December 2017 (UTC)