This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles
This redirect is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I think a small change could be made to the following text: "..archived by Google News.." Technically, Google News indexes news sites such as Infoshop News. Archiving means something different, which Google News isn't doing. Chuck0 (talk) 03:40, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I changed it to "carried", which may be a more accessible term for readers. Newspapers carry wire reports, and the way Google republishes news sites appears comparable. Or is that wrong in this context? ·:· Will Beback·:·04:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Would it be possible for somebody to rewrite this article to remove the personal stuff about me? Infoshop is a collective project and this personal stuff is misleading. Otherwise I'm going to ask for removal of this page. Thanks. Chuck0 (talk) 18:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
The article gives no personal information about you. If there are diffs where someone posted personal info, have those revisions oversighted. We are not removing encyclopedic content as it relates to your involvement with infoshop.org. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=icon}
