Talk:Ingraham v. Wright

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Removal of Pseudo-legal Gibberish

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed the following un-sourced text from the middle of reference 4:

The Supreme Court majority claimed that the Constitution's guarantee against cruel and unusual punishment does not apply to those who have committed no crime. Therefore, a murderer or other felon would be protected, but physical punishment would be allowed if the person is a child in school, or a citizen who got a parking ticket, or who got cited for some other minor infraction. The minority pointed out that there were many cases where a court had held the exact opposite.

That gibberish does not belong in the middle of a reference and it most certainly does not belong in the body of the article. AnnaBennett (talk) 14:56, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ingraham v. Wright. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110502075804/http://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/index.php to http://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic