Talk:Inheritance (Munch)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk14:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Inheritance (1890s)

5x expanded by Whispyhistory (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory (talk) at 06:57, 15 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Inheritance (Edvard Munch); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   @Whispyhistory and Philafrenzy: Expanded from prose size 254 B to 2659 B. WP:EARWIG shows one potential copyright violation with https://archive.org/stream/edvardmunchpsych00howe/edvardmunchpsych00howe_djvu.txt. This is not a problem since it is caused by a quote.

I'm not sure that the phrase inverted Madonna with child is immediately understandable to everyone. Maybe it could be changed to ... that Edvard Munch's Inheritance (pictured) is an inversion of the traditional "Madonna with child" theme? to give a little more context. The text in the source also takes this approach. It may also be a good idea to wikilink Madonna (art). What do you think? Phlsph7 (talk) 12:36, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply