Talk:Inhibitory postsynaptic potential

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of the brain, nerves and nervous system.

Untitled

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have no idea why there is a link to the norwegian version of the article, since the linked norwegian page is apparently the norwegian version of Template:Dorlands (although I have no idea whatsoever what this template is for). Was however unable to remove the misleading link, there is no norwegian link in the source text, is this a bug?? --Schneedrache 10:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

mIPSC, sIPSC, eIPSC

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Just because I came across this and it took me awhile to figure out exactly what the author's meant, I think there should be something explaining what is meant by miniature IPSCs vs spontaneous IPSCs, perhaps also evoked IPSCS as well. Here's the explanation and source

Spontaneous synaptic events can be recorded in almost any neuron and may be divided into two classes: those resulting from a spontaneous action potential in a presynaptic neuron (spontaneous postsynaptic current, sPSC), and those resulting from the release of a single transmitter vesicle in the absence of presynaptic activity (miniature postsynaptic current, mPSC). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1180923/pdf/biophysj00032-0229.pdf

Repapetilto (talk) 16:44, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hmm. The terms sIPSC and eIPSC are not really standard as far as I know -- it's not clear what a "spontaneous" action potential is supposed to be, except in the context of a specific stimulation protocol. The terms mIPSP and mIPSC are widely used and perhaps should be defined in the article. Looie496 (talk) 22:14, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

well its on the discussion page now anyway for people who are desperate enough to check this, it did really take me an unreasonably long time to find a reference explaining those terms though. Repapetilto (talk) 20:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

the graph is ungly ...

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

the yellow color is not nice .. maybe someone has a better one or changes the background color —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.50.102.89 (talk) 16:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think this may depend on the background you use in your browser. With a white background, as I have, it doesn't seem so bad. Any suggestions for a better color? Looie496 (talk) 17:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic