Talk:Inhomogeneous cosmology
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Photos of some of the cosmologists
editSome researchers' photos are available at Commons under CC-BY at Commons:File:Buchert11 team snapshot.xcf - the file is layered XCF (e.g. use GIMP) so that photos can easily be separated with or without the identifying initials. Boud (talk) 18:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
fold into "Timescape Cosmology"?
editI am writing (for Wiki Scientists class) the requested article Timescape Cosmology and have just stumbled upon this article, which describes (too obscurely, I think) the same thing. I'm thinking of folding this article into the other one.... (Not sure how to do that...)
Major revision
editI began the requested article "Timescape cosmology" but then found this page, which is the more general set of cosmologies of which timescape cos. is an example. I thus wrote a less jargonistic, layman's explanation of these cosmologies and their history and wove them in with the existing more scientific explanations here.
A section is needed on the "backreaction debate" between Green-Wald and Buchert, et. al. See https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/inhomogeneous+cosmology#Coley18 for a primer. Also could link to Wilshire's website, Buchert's, et. al. WritingMan (talk) 16:46, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Messing with the page as TEACHER/AUTHOR
editHello,
I recently added significantly to this article. I'm an instructor at a university and am today presenting at a conference on having grad students write on Wikipedia. Therefore, I'm messing with the page for a couple of minutes to show how it autocorrects... Thanks. WritingMan (talk) 07:43, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Could someone please clarify...
editIn the "dark matter" section of "history" is the following sentence:
"Although the nature of this energy has yet to be adequately explained, in the concordance almost 70% of the energy density of the universe in the concordance model."
Perhaps some words were deleted when someone did a copy-paste, or maybe they started the sentence thinking it would go one way and it ended up another; whatever the case, I'm not really sure what it's trying to say and I was hoping someone who does could rewrite it in a way that makes sense.
Many preemptive thanks! DoctorTronik (talk) 15:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Removal of undue weight notice
editI want to remove the undue weight notice regarding timescape cosmology. I can dig up more sources if necessary, but it's not undue weight to have a section covering one of the most (or the most) well known examples of these theories. -Jordgette [talk] 01:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC)