Talk:Innovation district

I am considering making edits to the Innovation District Wikipedia page in the next several weeks. Innovation districts are an increasingly popular topic in urban policy and are sprouting up in cities all across the world. The current Innovation District Wikipedia entry is limited in scope and only talks about Boston's innovation district. There are over 70 cities globally that have created innovation districts. However, there currently is no central database to document these initiatives and shared knowledge in urban revitalization policy-making is limited. I think broadening the scope of this page and documenting these initiatives would be beneficial to the urban planning community. Furthermore, I think defining an innovation district, the parties involved in development, opportunities / risks, differences domestically vs. internationally would be useful. Ideally, the edited entry will allow municipal leaders to Google "innovation district" and have a blueprint / toolkit to assess whether this initiative is something to pursue in his / her city.

Any thoughts on the revised page or comments are welcome!

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Innovation district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080410163502/http://www.seattle.gov/neighborhoods/preservation/ContextCascade04.pdf to http://www.seattle.gov/neighborhoods/preservation/ContextCascade04.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Innovation district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141227042751/http://www.newsobserver.com/welcome_page/?shf=%2F2012%2F11%2F09%2F2472170_new-rtp-master-plan-promises-more.html to http://www.newsobserver.com/welcome_page/?shf=%2F2012%2F11%2F09%2F2472170_new-rtp-master-plan-promises-more.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Tone problems

I have recently tagged the article for tone. The piece is rife with industry jargon and not written for a general audience. It's full of vacuous language such as "urban geographies of innovation" and "develop integrated strategies and solutions" that reads like corporate mission/vision statements and not an encyclopedia article. We need to use terminology the average person is going to parse to actually learn what an "innovation district" is, and not use such grandiose and vacuous terminology. --Jayron32 17:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC)