Talk:Innovative Interfaces

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

File:Iii logo 2011.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Iii logo 2011.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:22, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested edit

edit

{{Request edit}} Please remove flag for notability. This company, Innovative Interfaces, is notable because it is a currently operating, independent and privately held company with 300 employees. The company information and products mentioned have verification in the existing reference list. Here are additional references to establish notability.

  • Anne Gilliland (2000). [10.1108/03074800010345078 "The OhioLINK approach: records and holdings for print and electronic serials in the OhioLINK central catalog"]. New Library World. Retrieved September 21, 2011.

In addition, the page was most recently updated by the creator of the page who has no COI. Thompson1080 (talk) 16:23, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Question for administrator

edit

We are hoping to have three flags (for notability, secondary sources, and advert language) removed from the Innovative Interfaces page. We have taken steps to address all three flags. Independent secondary sources have been added, as well as edits by the page's creator to put neutral language in place. Is there anything else we need to do to have all three flags removed? We would appreciate this happening or further instructions. We put a request for the notability flag to be removed (above) but have not heard back as far as we know. Thank you kindly! --Thompson1080 (talk) 17:39, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the {{admin request}} and {{adminhelp}} above, and replaced it with {{Request edit}} - because, this is not a request that requires an administrator.  Chzz  ►  17:54, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Requested changes   Done after I rewrote or removed a few still slightly-too-promotional phrases. There is no notability issue with this organisation, and the number of secondary sources provided is sufficient for such a short article. Some of the sources from your edit request (above) still need to be integrated into the article. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 09:03, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

There is a flag for citations on Innovative Interfaces. Because more third party citations have been added in-line would it be possible to remove this flag? --KatRahn

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Innovative Interfaces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:08, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Innovative Interfaces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply