Talk:Inside Out (2002 TV programme)

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Requested move 9 September 2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru (talk) 20:18, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

– There are multiple issues to unpack here:

The first is that there is no provision for "sub-national" disambiguation under WP:NCTV, so Inside Out (Scottish TV series) would usually be covered under WP:NCTVUK, but as there are two UK TV shows with this title, Inside Out (Scottish TV series) and Inside Out (UK TV series) need to be diambiguated from each other "by year" (hatnotes will likely be needed on top of that...).
The second is that Inside Out (UK TV series) is another one of these "complex" ones – it consists of a "(regional) series" of "current affairs TV programmes": i.e. a "series" here meaning multiple different programmes. But as each edition is a "current affairs TV programme", the article should probably be disambiguated by "programme" under WP:NCTV, rather than "series" (which implies "continuing story elements", something that doesn't apply to unscripted news programming).
Third, it is questionable that WP:SMALLDETAILS is enough to leave Inside/Out (TV series) without additional "by country" disambiguation... Or, at the least, I don't know if it is – I'll let those who comment here help sort this out, as the third move may or may not be necessary... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:48, 9 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 19:33, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Support - for all the reasons given. Before anyone thinks that "Scottish" is a good option, how do you decide that without that being opinion based? ITV, a British company, owns Scottish Television who produced the series. So by WP:NCTV - which goes by country of broadcast, its "UK". Also, this opens up a huge can of worms for people who would then want to argue that a series is "English" or "N. Ireland" or even "Floridian". To IJBall, I knew we should have solved this issue at the Agenda discussion. I'll just repeat and say that there needs to be a better word for these kind of programs (as I'm sure this won't be the last). --Gonnym (talk) 21:42, 9 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
The first title (UK) is problematic anyway due to the Scottish one, WP:INCDAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:36, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom. Unreal7 (talk) 22:16, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic