Talk:Insituform
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Insituform article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Flag
editI added a cleanup flag to the article. I noticed that there wasn't a "References" or "External links" section, so I added those. I attempted to correctly code the references and most of them are to the company's website. Let me know what you think, I think this article could use a rewrite/reformat. News Team Assemble [!!!] 00:52, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Aegion
editDo we need to change the name of this page to Aegion, since that's the parent company now? I'm not sure how all that works. W0lfie (talk) 20:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Insituform. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929100247/http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5736166-description.html to http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5736166-description.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)