Talk:Institute for Statecraft
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lennart97 in topic Free University of Brussels
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Institute for Statecraft article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
Lead rewrite tag
editI've tagged this article with {{lead rewrite}} as part of reviewing it for new page patrol; while the article as a whole appears to be well sourced and neutrally written, no mention of the controversies which dominate coverage of the subject in RS is included in the lead. This should be addressed. signed, Rosguill talk 21:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Free University of Brussels
edit@Bobfrombrockley: You recently added, among other things, that Its academic papers are published through the Free University of Brussels
. Free University of Brussels is a disambiguation page, however, as there are two separate universities with that (English) name. Do you know which one it is? Lennart97 (talk) 17:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- It looks most likely to be VUB, as some googling suggested links to VUB-IES (the Institute for European Studies at VUB) but the source isn't clear I'm afraid. Sorry. BobFromBrockley (talk) 11:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Bobfrombrockley: Thanks for the reply. The link to the disambiguation page will somehow have to go (see for example WP:DPL), and there's a few options for that.
- Go with VUB as that's the most likely;
- Add a footnote that explains that it's not currently known which of the two it is;
- Remove the mention, at least until (if ever) we do find out with certainty which one is meant.
- Which one is preferable to you? Lennart97 (talk) 11:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- I think go with VUB as most likely, but not ideal. BobFromBrockley (talk) 11:20, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Then we'll go with that. I've changed the link. Lennart97 (talk) 15:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- I think go with VUB as most likely, but not ideal. BobFromBrockley (talk) 11:20, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Bobfrombrockley: Thanks for the reply. The link to the disambiguation page will somehow have to go (see for example WP:DPL), and there's a few options for that.