Talk:Institute of Medicine Equation

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Undefined acronym

edit

It's not clear what EER stands for. I can kind of figure it out based on context, but it should be defined. DRogers (talk) 03:40, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

What is the equation based on?

edit

"The equation doesn't measure BMR, but uses experiments based on doubly labelled water." Aside from containing a typo, this doesn't make much sense to me. I'm still not sure what this equation is measuring. DRogers (talk) 03:40, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Corrections formulas

edit

"Correction formulae are used for overweight and obese individuals." What are these correction formulas? DRogers (talk) 03:40, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Institute of Medicine Equation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Equation for girls and boys aged 3-18 may be incorrect

edit

Based on other websites, I think the offset in this equation is incorrect. I think it should have 20, or 25 added to it. I do not have access to the published source material because it is behind a pay-wall, if anyone does have access to the original citation, could they check it. The other websites I looked at are

However, I would prefer if it was corrected in accordance with the source citation KreyszigB