Talk:Integrated injection logic
Latest comment: 13 years ago by 60.241.12.136 in topic Why Obsolete
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I believe "Integrated" is wrong, Should be "Current Injection Logic" - referring to current by the symbol, "i"
Why Obsolete
editIf its so good, why is it now obsolete? Tabby (talk) 16:11, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
This asked and answered here:
CMOS uses less power http://groups.google.com.au/g/2687fefa/t/e0107f36dbdf3bba/d/d61d7d0efb297647?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&q=happened+i2l#d61d7d0efb297647
I2L was slower and didn't scale up well because the output of the gate needed a separate collector for each input it connected to. https://groups.google.com/group/alt.folklore.computers/browse_thread/thread/353e483bc5f7bb9e/73d0c4361faed77?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&q=happened+i2l#073d0c4361faed77