Talk:Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have deleted the below paragraph from the text as it contained no citations or references and appears to be strictly a personal opinion. I also question its relevancy:

"It should also be noted that Integrity Staffing Solutions sole client is Amazon.com Fulfillment Centers nationwide. (New Jersey - Robbinsville, NJ) They contract with no other industrial plants. While Amazon can shift the blame and avoid prosecution by assigning blame to a third-party In essence Amazon is creating a "Monopoly" and an unfair labor market for other competent agencies to take over the role as security force presence in their warehouse."2602:306:C407:D070:AC4D:184E:EF4E:39EE (talk) 19:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic