| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Intel MPX article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contested deletion
editThis page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Emperor-Overlord100 (talk) 19:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC) What? This page doesn't advertise anything.
- What on earth do you think it is doing? It has a download link! Fiddle Faddle 19:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
It has link to Intel architecture extensions reference documents. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emperor-Overlord100 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC) Showing reference material is not advertisement.--Emperor-Overlord100 (talk) 20:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
New section
editThis page looks from the very 1st statement like an advertise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.85.118.36 (talk) 16:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- The potential trouble comes from the fact it's still only an announced feature, not available in any of the readily available products beside the Intel's emulator software. However, the content is backed by a few references. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 18:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Explain compatibility
editThis article should discuss what happens when MPX code is run on a non-MPX processor. Simsong (talk) 11:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hello! Well, such a combination simply wouldn't work, as the MPX extension introduces new instructions and registers. Pretty much similar to the MMX extension, for example. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 12:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)