Talk:Intel X99

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Intel X99 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Intel (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Intel, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.IntelWikipedia:WikiProject IntelTemplate:WikiProject IntelIntel articles

Maybe we should mention some of the rollout issues of this chipset?

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Early bios versions were universally problematic. USB and ram compatibility issues caused problems for early adopters. Posimosh (talk) 17:04, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello! No matter how common such issues are after a new hardware platform is launched, which X99 is no exception to, providing reliable sources for such information would be rather difficult, and describing such issues wouldn't be well suited for an encyclopedia anyway. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 17:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic