Talk:Intensive crop farming

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Lead rewrite

edit

Intro obviously not about Industrial agriculture (crops)--Cerejota 10:24, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Some of us have found that no matter how much effort we put into writing sourced relevant material about industrial farming that it much of it just gets deleted for reasons that make no sense to us even after months of talking. That is very discouraging. It discourages me from trying to better the lead of this article until SlimVirgin agrees that this article should even exist in the first place. See the problem? WAS 4.250 18:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
  1. Please, stop the personal attacks. This is about content, not people. If you think that SlimVirgin is involved any wrongdoing, please follow the dispute resolution procedures.
  2. This article has existed for a while, with no AfD challenge, so I do not understand why you claim anyone is opposed to it.
  3. No one owns articles in wikipedia, so I do not understand how anything could keep you from making anything better.
  4. Please be bold but make sure to keep in mind things like WP:5P and WP:MOS.
Thanks!--Cerejota 11:20, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Synthesis

edit

After careful study, I realize this page and the related Industrial agriculture (animals) are WP:SYNTH. They need to be mergesd into the parent page, and then reworked, and then if necessary forked in a more correct form. Thanks!--Cerejota 01:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please will you explain the results of your careful study. Do not disrupt Wikipedia to make your point. Spenny 09:42, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Minimum to Zero Tillages Systems

edit

Benefits:

edit

Reduced wind/water erosion

Reduced carbon imprint due to trapped carbon in soil

Improved soil structure with increased humus

Reduced evaporation

Physical support and protection of delicate pulses

Disadvantages

edit

Herbicide dependence

Herbicide resistance

Increased expense

Increased capital investment

Requires an accurate and repeatable sowing method

Increased fire risk

Methods

edit

Precision agriculture

Herbicide plant control/Chemical fallow

Crop rotation

I am concerned that the current revolution in Australian broad acre agriculture does not appear to rate a mention in Wiki. Perhaps someone will correct me if I'm mistaken. I propose a new section in this article although it may be more appropriate to start a new article. Where should this article be placed? Above is a rough outline. Nnoddy (talk) 22:26, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata not proper

edit

The Wikidata entry for this article is currently not configured properly. I do not have time to fix this now and it may not be an obvious fix - I am not sure. I just wanted to note this. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:59, 5 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I am sorry to say that I have no idea what Wikidata is all about. Never dealt with it. But I am sorry if I messed something up! Jytdog (talk) 15:23, 5 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

source suggested by IP editor

edit
  • Robertson, Ricky. "Crop Changes National Geographic". National Geographic. Madison. Retrieved 3 March 2016.

there you go. Jytdog (talk) 19:02, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Intensive crop farming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply