Talk:Interference fit

Metalworking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering Stub‑class

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology Start‑class

	Technology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Dead link

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The external link to "Diagram of an interference fit" is broken and I wasn't able to find the correct one. It appears to be a link into Engineer on a Disk which has moved to hughjack.com. Neil Mayhew (talk) 01:05, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've fixed the link. Thanks for the heads up. Wizard191 (talk) 18:12, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Equations

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This page really needs equations. given moduli, inner OD, outer ID and OD, overlap length, and coefficient of friction, what's the press force and the slipping torque? —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 16:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interference fit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090926142345/http://www.emerson-ept.com:80/eptroot/kopflex/Engineered/FAQ/design.htm to http://www.emerson-ept.com/EPTRoot/kopflex/Engineered/FAQ/design.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Muddling Metric and Imperial makes it almost incomprensible

The muddling of metric and imperial measures almost makes this article incomprehensible. We should stick with one or the other. From a technical point of view when talking about interference or press fitting it probably makes no sense to say something is 10mm and then give the imperial value for it - in an engineering shop you are working in one or the other.

Then later in the article we move to just imperial and then some of these are give in alternative metric. Most people don't work in both I suggest Metric and Imperial sections - remember more than 99.99% of the world works in metric!

Add topic