Talk:Internal resistance to apartheid

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 105.245.178.214 in topic History

Origins

edit

This is a split from (the very long) South Africa under apartheid, as mooted and approved on its talk page. 9Nak (talk) 14:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Internal resistance" is a very emotive term. Wouldn't "internal opposition", or better still, "domestic opposition" be better? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 (talk) 19:22, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

The image Image:Progressive Federal Party causus 1988.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

New reference

edit

A recent edit added the following as a reference at the very start of the article (diff):

Anthony Sampson in 'Mandela', The authorised biography of Nelson Mandela(1999,2000):chp.4(Afrikaners v. Africans 1946-1949; chp.5(Nationalists v. Communists 1950-1951: chp.6(Defiance 1952)

Since that is not helpful to the article, I have moved it here in case someone wants to consider using the book as a reference for specific information in the article. Johnuniq (talk) 07:57, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 3 April 2015

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move to Internal resistance to apartheid. It will also be worth cleaning up the article with clearer references to South West Africa, which is mentioned a few times in the text. Cúchullain t/c 14:36, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


Internal resistance to South African apartheidInternal resistance to Apartheid – I don't think the "South African" part of the title is necessary. It was removed form the main article, why don't we do the same here? Charles Essie (talk) 21:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

weak oppose GregKaye 23:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Soweto uprising

edit

'Crowd control methods used by South African police at the time included mainly dispersement techniques, and many of the officers shot indiscriminately, killing 176 people, most by police violence.'

One non-sequitur and one apparent contradiction - needs work, I think.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Internal resistance to apartheid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:22, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Internal resistance to apartheid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

History gr11

edit

how did the apartheid regime respond to mass resistance in the 1950s and early 1960s 41.246.25.184 (talk) 09:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Apartheid south Africa 1940s-1960s

edit

Apartheid south Africa 1940s-1960s 41.116.156.4 (talk) 14:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

History

edit

Essay national party government enforce the apartheid and it policy so effectively that there was no resistance critically discuss this statement 105.245.178.214 (talk) 19:57, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply