Talk:International Celestial Reference Frame

I'm a bit confused between the International Celestial Reference System and the ICRF. I'll try to sort this out and clarify in the article. MFago 04:56, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

"Relativity implies there is no true inertial frame"?!

This assertion needs to be clarified, if indeed it is true. HEL 23:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Also, "relativity" in this sentence needs to be disambiguated. HEL 23:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Epoch and equinox

These two concepts are confused in the articles about ICRF and epoch. This should be corrected by an expert. The FK5 is mentioned which it should not be. 11 October 2009 EHoeg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.157.130.87 (talk) 11:48, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Celestial Reference Frame. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150725164148/http://ww2.iers.org/SharedDocs/Publikationen/EN/IERS/Publications/tn/TechnNote35/tn35.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1%2CtemplateId%3Draw%2Cproperty%3DpublicationFile.pdf%2Ftn35.pdf to http://ww2.iers.org/SharedDocs/Publikationen/EN/IERS/Publications/tn/TechnNote35/tn35.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1%2CtemplateId%3Draw%2Cproperty%3DpublicationFile.pdf%2Ftn35.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)