This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, I saw this page marked for a speedy delete but don't see the contest button that Wikipedia mentioned anywhere? Anyway, and I wanted to ask about reconsidering that as I don't think the original criteria for deletion apply any longer. I'm new here, so trying to figure all this out.
The page was originally created/deleted 7 years ago, with notes that it wasn't well-sourced and concerns about whether the org was notable enough. To request a reconsideration for a deleted page, Wikipedia directs you to contact the deleting author, but that account hasn't been active in a year or so so this was my next step. I sourced this page from reputable sources like ProPublica, CNBC, etc. This is a group that is suing states and cities over labor legislation and spending millions on lobbying lawmakers, so I do think they fit the guidelines on notability in the public's interest (I didn't want to put too much of that on the page because I wanted to be impartial - if requested I can certainly include news coverage of the court cases).
Given the above, would you reconsider the deletion? I'd appreciate it.
