Talk:International Museum of Women
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 April 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of International Museum of Women be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in San Francisco may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.imow.org/home/index. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under the GNU Free Documentation License. Because this permission was received prior to 1 November 2008, you may use the material under either that license or the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2008040610011213. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
Text Permission
editI am a staff member of the International Museum of Women and have copyright permission to post this tect on Wikipedia. I will also send an email to permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org verifying that this is true.
Erin DarwinImowed (talk) 19:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
August 2008
editI cleaned up some following a merge of the exhibit, which was equally filled with PR speak. I realise from the above that permission was granted to use the text, but it was still wholly unencyclopedic. There is no doubt that the museum is notable but al lot of what I found about it was polirical and PR speak so it needs some fleshing out in a neutral tone. I don't have time to work on it at the moment but I think it's a little better than it was. TravellingCari 15:36, 17 August 2008 (UTC)