Wikipedia

Talk:International Open Series

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Move request to move iOS (Apple) to IOS

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  Resolved
 – Relevant discussion can be found there: Talk:iOS (Apple)#Requested move 3

IOS is currently a disambiguation page, and it links to this one. Its proposed to move iOS (Apple) over than and move the redirect to IOS (disambiguation). See Talk:IOS (Apple)#Requested Move 3 if you wish to comment. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 20:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Article renaming

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
  Resolved
 – Article split to UK Tour (Challenge Tour was already taken). Betty Logan (talk) 07:38, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think we should move this article to WPBSA secondary professional tour. For a start it covers two different events by two different governing bodies, and I think it would work better as an article covering the secondary circuit. Both events were unified by their ability to promote players to the main tour, so it's better to cover it all as one topic. Betty Logan (talk) 21:21, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't think this is a good idea, as PIOS wasn't event professional. Maybe a split? Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 22:13, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
If you would prefer to do it that way, it might be better. It would be more in keeping with how we cover other tournaments. Technically the PTC is the successor to the Challenge Tour anyway as the secondary professional tour and that has its own article. Betty Logan (talk) 22:22, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
I think, after another look, that splitting is the best option, as the 2 events aren't the same. I mean they ran concurrently for for four seasons. Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 22:34, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

WPBSA/EASB-professional/pro-am/amateur

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The WPBSA established an open tour in 2001/02 season. This was a professional event open to professionals and amateurs (like the current PTC). The following season (2002/03) the EASB (which was a WPBSA partner at the time and organized amateur events) took over organization of the open tour and they maintained the same criteria, permitting pros and amateurs. Since the EASB is an amateur body by definition it cannot organize a professional event! That is the WPBSA's function. As such the status of the tournament switched from professional to pro-am: when amateur bodies permit professionals entry to their events this is what they are categorized as. The EASB split from the WPBSA the following season (2003/04) and barred all professionals and non-English nationals from participating, thus turning the event into an amateur competition. All of this documented in The Cuesport Book of Professional Snooker written by Eric Hayton, and appropriately referenced in the article. I am not able to put it online because it is a print text. However, it comprehensively lists all the seasons, all the tournament names and in the case of the Open Tour the governing bodies too. Betty Logan (talk) 20:25, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ronnie79 Hi Betty i am a snooker statistician researching all snooker events. Can you remove the "pro-am" status from the above series for the 2002/2003 season.The WPBSA and EASB were still in partnership.all professionals and amateurs were allowed to take part in these events if they wanted as an Open Tour.It was similar to the PTC or more recently the European Tour events. Professional and amateurs playing in an event starting on a level playing field is not a pro-am event. A "pro-am" is where a professional has to give an amateur player an 18 or 21 point head start like in the 'Pink Ribbon' this is a proper "pro-am". Can you have a look at this please ? Regards Ronnie79
Pro-ams do not preclude competition on level terms. The EASB is an amaetur body and amateur bodies by definition do not organize professional events. The EASB being in partnership with the WPBSA does not make EASB events professional any more than it makes WPBSA events amateur: all it means here is that they had an arrangement where each others members could enter some of each others' events. When the WPBSA ran the open tour it was a professional event. When the EASB took over it became a pro-am. Once they precluded professionals it became an amateur event. If you want to re-label an event organized by an amateur organization a professional event you are going to have to provide a source that explicitly labels it as such. Betty Logan (talk) 19:49, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on International Open Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 19 external links on International Open Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:International_Open_Series&oldid=1206085878"