Talk:International Religious Freedom Act of 1998

Unsourced vague final sentence

"Critics of this Act would probably contend that while the US Constitution does prohibit Federal and State governments from infringing on the religious liberties of people living within the US, it does not obligate or permit the US to use embargo or military intervention as means to uphold these rights abroad." Who cares what hypothetical people "would probably" contend? (I'm such a critic - this is for the UN, not the US - but I'm not encyclopaedic.) --Hugh7 (talk) 00:02, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Questionable non-sourced sentence in lead paragraph

The following sentence was added by User:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington in 2006 and apparently has remained since:

"The United States through its constitution and various international agreements has an obligation to support religious freedom around the world by skirmishing religious intolerance in countries that put sanctions on the religious rights of the people."

I would like to see a reliable source in support of this statement, particularly for the opinion that the U.S. Constitution creates an obligation on the part of the government, or even the authority, to support religious freedom around the world. I think the No Religious Test Clause and the First Amendment are the only places where religion are mentioned and neither creates an obligation to extend the rights of Americans to other parts of the world — which is not to imply that it has not inspired other peoples since its establishment to demand similar rights in their own countries.

Also, to use the phrase "skirmishing religious intolerance" — which strikes me as an odd metaphor as compared to the unremarkable metaphor of "battling religious intolerance" — seems to suggest that this metaphor is used by some reliable authority or original source and I would expect to see a cite for such an unusual turn of phrase (n.b. Skirmisher). —Blanchette (talk) 22:47, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

You are right. I can't recall why I added that sentence to the lead paragraph. I will remove it now. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 04:22, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

OK, I may have sourced the assertion from this page : Legislative Focus, The International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, Thomas Lynch. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 04:29, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

2016 expansion?

Saw in the news recently that new amendments were added in 2016, which do not seem to be noted in the article. Anyone have a better understanding?

• https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2016/05/16/house-section/article/H2399-1
• News commentary: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/obama-s-signature-u-s-religious-freedom-law-protects-atheists-n699356

Indefensible (talk) 07:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Religious Freedom Act of 1998. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060830200205/http://web.africa.ufl.edu/asq/v7/v7i2a29.htm to http://web.africa.ufl.edu/asq/v7/v7i2a29.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Religious Freedom Act of 1998. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140529190648/http://jpupdates.com/2014/05/29/house-passes-meng-legislation-make-desecration-cemeteries-violation-religious-freedom/ to http://jpupdates.com/2014/05/29/house-passes-meng-legislation-make-desecration-cemeteries-violation-religious-freedom/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)