Talk:International School of Stavanger
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
NPOV
editI'm guessing someone from the school will eventually see the notice and remove it. Will they even check the talk page? I don't think so. Let alone make the article a little less unbiased, with all the goings on about how great it is.
I have no problems with the facts in it, only the way in which it is written, which does not at all amount to what I expect of a good wikipedia article. A History section (without five pages of b$ about successful people who went there) might take away from the boastfulness of this page... 85.166.130.249 19:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC) root@LAPTOP
- Hey. This page is made by people from the school. I think they should be allowed to express their opinions on the matter! If it's a crappy school (which it is), they might as well say so. 85.166.160.209 19:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
My breif experience with the school was posative although after returning to the states I heard that the school was shrinking due to the loss of oil wealth. Someone vandalized the heck out of it too. There's nothing left.
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.isstavanger.no/about/profile.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. X96lee15 (talk) 00:49, 12 May 2016 (UTC)