Talk:International Simultaneous Policy Organization
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis page was previously the "Simultaneous Policy Organization" - I moved it to match both the organization's name and links on the Simultaneous policy page. --Cje 08:08, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The original article was strongly POV - a brief ISPO manifesto. In my rewrite I made some of the statements from the article quotations and attributed them to the ISPO. I think this is accurate as the the name John Bunzl with his title "Director International Simultaneous Policy Organisation (ISPO)" appeared at the bottom as a signature.I have not contacted Mr Bunzl to confirm that he wrote the article, but it certainly seems consistent with the ISPO's website.
Finally, I removed some material as it seemed to be unnecessary overlap with Simultaneous policy
--Cje 09:12, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Self-published sources
editNearly this entire article is based upon self-published sources. I believe its author User:Fountain Posters to be a paid editor.24.22.129.215 (talk) 04:09, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- [Sigh] Now I've heard everything. Sorry, so long that I've forgotten, lets see: Global Public Media, Guardian, TED are all referenced sources. Please be my guest to check to see the articles I have edited. From the top of my head I'd guess that 99.99% of subjects that I have edited over the years have little to no money. So I'll take your suggestion as a backhanded compliment. I must get a life and stop editing; so please, more suggestions like this - it really puts me off editing (and therefore may help me get one). Fountain Posters (talk) 04:51, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Meaningless without linked page, which is now gone
editThis article is uninformative on its own because it never explains what Simultaneous Policy is. That was presumably fine when there was a separate Wikipedia article called "Simultaneous Policy" (as two links in this article imply), but unfortunately that article seems to have been deleted because now those links just redirect back to this page. Without such an explanation, this article is so circular as to be meaningless. Can someone restore the deleted article or add explanatory content to this one? 153.31.112.21 (talk) 12:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- You are right, so I copied text from old article "Sim...Pol" to this one. They should not be separate articles at this time. (To access the old aricle and it's history , clink on the line that says "redirected from"... ) Some reduncy needs to be reduced, have at it. GangofOne (talk) 21:09, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Election and voting-related organizations & Electoral reform groups
editThis page is listed under Election and voting-related organizations & Electoral reform groups, however nothing in the text supports that. --82.15.89.151 (talk) 12:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC)