Talk:International reactions to the Rohingya genocide
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International reactions to the Rohingya genocide article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Guild of Copy Editors | ||||
|
Please date the actions & statements you report
editThis web page is covering a broad period of time, during which many extreme events have happened -- and governments around the world have been altering their positions in various ways (many of them changing very signficantly during this time.). So, for instance -- rather than just saying: "Botswana expressed sympathy for the Rohingya," -- please say WHEN: "On August 25th, 2017. Botswana expressed..." (or at least "in August, 2017. Botswana expressed...")
And please insert your notations in the correct chronlogial order, if practical.
These refinements to your edits will give much clearer context to this article -- especially since, during this time, many countries have changed their positions, back and forth, radically, in response to other countries' actions, on specific dates, and in response other date-specific events. Showing the timing greatly improves understanding.
Thanks, ~ Penlite (talk) 05:35, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Italy
editThe Permanent Peoples' Tribunal is a nongovernmental organization. The response from the Italian government, i.e. its statement to the UN Security Council, should be placed in that section before the mention of the Permanent People's Tribunal. The article is after all concerned with the formal response of states.--Fez Cap 12 (talk) 18:08, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on International reactions to the 2016–17 Rohingya persecution in Myanmar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20171005154344/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/the-latest-myanmar-denies-ethnic-cleansing-of-muslims/2017/09/28/e86bf132-a4a9-11e7-b573-8ec86cdfe1ed_story.html to https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/the-latest-myanmar-denies-ethnic-cleansing-of-muslims/2017/09/28/e86bf132-a4a9-11e7-b573-8ec86cdfe1ed_story.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170928151014/http://www.njherald.com/article/20170925/AP/309259806 to http://www.njherald.com/article/20170925/AP/309259806
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Edit request
editHello, I would like to request an edit regarding the Afghanistan section. It should specify that the statement was made by the former government of Afghanistan (Islamic Republic of Afghanistan). The current government, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, as far as I know, has not made any official statement on the Rohingya genocide. 2601:644:8B80:2690:906B:A529:3611:3785 (talk) 04:46, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Crimea should not be shown as part of Russia
editYes, it’s been annexed, but the annexation is widely seen by the international community as illegal, and Ukraine is still fighting a war for control of its territory. The Crimean Peninsula should be shown as part of Ukraine on the map. LordOfWalruses (talk) 13:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)