Talk:Internet Identity Workshop
Add topic| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How do I fix pseudoheading error?
[edit]@Mathglot How do I remove the pseudoheading error in my newly published page? Scottmace (talk) 03:51, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Done already. Mathglot (talk) 03:58, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! Scottmace (talk) 04:06, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Lead sentence
[edit]It's hard to know what "...is a community and gathering place" means. You can read several sentences of the article, and still not know if it is a corporation with a headquarters building, an organization with a website, a site with only an online presence, or something else. That should be very clear after the first sentence. The date it was launched, and where, probably belongs there too, or at worst in sentence two if that would make the lead sentence too long or awkward. See WP:LEADSENTENCE. Mathglot (talk) 04:58, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- "is an ongoing series of semi-annual conferences" seems more accurate.Brandonlee25 (talk) 07:11, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Tone
[edit]There is a kind of corporate-speak WP:TONE in the article that needs to be purged. Terms like 'stakeholders', 'significant', 'influential', ' fostering an open and collaborative environment', while not forbidden expressions, all contribute to a sense of promotion or WP:PUFFERY, and make the article seem more like a PR piece and less like an encyclopedic article. The tone should be that of a sober, informative article written from a neutral position without exaggeration or hagiographic terms, unless supported by reliable sources that use those terms. Mathglot (talk) 10:35, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Is frequently cited
[edit]You can't just make assertions like, The IIW has been frequently cited in numerous theses and dissertations even if it is true, if you are the one observing these frequent citations. It has to be based on a secondary source that makes that observation; then you can say it. Saying it based on what you found by researching how frequently it is cited, and then reporting your observations in the article is original research, and is expressly forbidden by Pillar Two of Wikipedia's Five Pillars. Mathglot (talk) 11:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
AI
[edit]Flagged for AI, info: since v1, note WP:AISIGNS - undue emphasis on significance, promotionality, AIVOCAB density, outline-like structure about challenges/future directions, etc
The above "is frequently cited" is one of those. Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:03, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Unknown-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class California articles
- Unknown-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles