Talk:Interruption marketing

Brands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Clean up ambiguity

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

OK I've given this some thought and bounced the idea around. I'm going to to be WP:BOLD an try to clean up ambiguity around four articles:

Inbound marketing in the older sense of product management
Inbound marketing in the newer sense of permission marketing
Outbound marketing in the older sense of product marketing
Outbound marketing in the newer (pejorative) sense of interruption marketing

The end goal I propose is four articles titled product management, permission marketing, product marketing, and interruption marketing plus two disambiguation pages titled inbound marketing (disambiguation), and out bound marketing (disambiguation). Given that at least six articles are affected, I suggest we keep any discussion in one thread on Talk:Inbound marketing/Archives/2012#Clean_up_ambiguity. Woz2 (talk) 11:45, 22 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic