Talk:Interstate 194 (Michigan)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   A. Prose quality

   • The two sentences describing the end of the highway I would suggest to combine those and say something like "...ends at an ...Hamblin Avenue, north of which is only signed as M-66" Something like that, I also think you need a word between intersection and Hamblin.
   • As a semantic argument "is completely concurrent with M-66" implies that I-194 is concurrent with M-66 for its entire length, when its M-66 that is concurrent with I-194 for its entire length. Although re-reading it it could be interpreted both ways I suppose. Your call.
   • In the history I think you need to spell out "ML King Drive"

   B. MoS compliant

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   A. References to sources

   • One of the in-lines for reference #5 is inside the punctuation
   • Might want to tag The Penetrator in the opening paragraph with an inline citation to the A Drive Down Memory Lane book
   • Help me out with the PA 93/1976, the PDF mentions two items were repealed and that PA 142 of 2001 which in Section 28 says "The portion of highway M-66 that is in Calhoun county shall be known as the Sojourner Truth Memorial Highway"[1] and I failed at finding information on Act 208 of 1993.

   B. Citations to reliable sources

   C. No original research

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   A. Major aspects

   B. Focused

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   A. Images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales

   B. Appropriate use with suitable captions

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail

Those are my suggestions at the moment, so I'll put this article on hold until they're addressed. Feel free to leave comments or questions. Good job. Cheers Strato|sphere 23:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I've fixed the instance of then ref #5, and retagged the "Penetrator" back to the newspaper article reference in the lead. (I do personally dislike cites in the lead for items discussed in the body of the article though.)

I pulled the PA reference, since all of that info was in the Memory Lane book.

I've done some copy-editing. Let me know if this clears things up for you. Imzadi1979 (talk) 19:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Looks good, passed it. I must have missed the penetrator reference later in the text, feel free to switch it back. Good job :) Strato|sphere 02:32, 22 November 2008 (UTC)