Talk:Interstate 605 (Washington)/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Rschen7754 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rschen7754 21:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Prose review
Lead - Proposals have been around since the 1960- Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
The Washington State Department of Transportation has no projects designated I-605, however a project converting Washington State Route 18 to a full limited-access freeway is nearing completion, which is south and east of both I-5 and I-405. - run-on- Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Proposals - Some of the first plans for a new interstate freeway, bypassing I-405 surfaced in 1968, - the commas make this really hard to read. Try adding one after I-405.- Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Same sentence - another run-on- Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Better, but there's still a run-on. -Rschen7754 00:56, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Now? --Admrboltz (talk) 00:59, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Better, but there's still a run-on. -Rschen7754 00:56, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Next sentence - another run-on- Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
This isn't the WA-18 article, I don't see the need for the infobox.- Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
On hold - should be quick fixes, and then a pass. --Rschen7754 22:15, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Passing article. --Rschen7754 01:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC)