Talk:Interstate 605 (Washington)/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Rschen7754 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rschen7754 21:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
Prose review
Lead - Proposals have been around since the 1960
  Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
The Washington State Department of Transportation has no projects designated I-605, however a project converting Washington State Route 18 to a full limited-access freeway is nearing completion, which is south and east of both I-5 and I-405. - run-on
  Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Proposals - Some of the first plans for a new interstate freeway, bypassing I-405 surfaced in 1968, - the commas make this really hard to read. Try adding one after I-405.
  Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Same sentence - another run-on
  Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Better, but there's still a run-on. -Rschen7754 00:56, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Now? --Admrboltz (talk) 00:59, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Next sentence - another run-on
  Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
This isn't the WA-18 article, I don't see the need for the infobox.
  Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

On hold - should be quick fixes, and then a pass. --Rschen7754 22:15, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Passing article. --Rschen7754 01:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply