Talk:Interstate 680 (California)/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Miller17CU94 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Well-written.
  • Lead section
    • Add "its southernmost point" between "...begins" and "at...".
  • Route description section
    • In the last sentence of the least paragraph, spell out California General Assembly in the Assembly Concurrent Resolution 104, chapter 168.
    • For the last sentence of the second paragraph, be more specific in mentioning "takeover robbery"? Is that a carjacking?
    • In the final paragraph's fourth sentence, check spelling of Carquinez Strait. It may be misspelled.
  • History section
    • Create articles or redirects if needed for US101E, Martinez-Benica Ferry, California Route 74, and urgency measure.
    • In the lead sentence of the fourth paragraph, put "(Federal Highway Administration after 1967)" after The Bureau of Public Roads.
  • Future section
    • How long has the proposal to add a high-occupancy toll been under consideration? Please specify.
Factually accurate and verifiable.
  • References missing on the first five paragraphs in the Route descrption section.
  • No references listed in the Future section.
  • For references listed, use WP:CITET to get formats standardized.
  • Reference 10: Create article for California Highways and Public Works.
  • Reference 15: Create article for urgency measure.
  • Reference 16: Create and italicize San Mateo Times.
  • References 20 and 22: Italicize Oakland Tribune.
  • Reference 29: Shown as "Forbidden" when checked out. Find alternative reference.
  • External link: The link has been moved. Please show.
Neutral.
  • No issues.
Stable.
  • Last edit was yesterday. Prior to that, it was on 5 May 2010.
Images.
  • All images are valid.
  • For images taken in the Route description section and the first one in the History section, list when the images were take in the caption.
Overall
  • Hold. Needs works, but can be done for GA.

Reviewer: Chris (talk) 13:36, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I believe the red links do not need to be created for it to be GA. Also, for the stability section, what do you mean? --PCB 20:14, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
It was when the last set of edits took place. This was for point of reference on stability. Sorry about the misunderstanding. Chris (talk) 22:49, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Looks good so far. Do not forget to put dates the images were taken as mentioned in the images section review. Chris (talk) 15:04, 14 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Passed GA. Chris (talk) 15:12, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply