Talk:Interstate 97

South Terminus

The routebox currently lists I-595 as the southern terminus, maybe we'd be better off using US 50 instead, since I-595 isn't signed?-Jeff 03:07, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

True. I did it late last night and I didn't feel like putting them all in. Sorry about that. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:16, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Plans

1980 1982 1983 —Preceding unsigned comment added by SPUI (talk • contribs)

Map

I just noticed, the map shows the route ending a bit away from 895. Or, at least, it shows a red line that stops at a blue line (not at an intersection). ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:30, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

I-97 Factoids

The author should add the following factoid: I-97 is the only 2-digit Interstate not to connect to another 2-digit Interstate. The reference for this factoid is http://www.mdroads.com/routes/is097.html. The author should change the reference for the "shortest" and "intracounty" factoids to point to the above webpage, as it contains all three. Intracounty is spelled incorrectly and should be changed to intra-county to reflect the correct spelling.

Voyager62 (talk) 17:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC)Voyager62

@Voyager62:, thanks for the recent discussion threads you've opened. One word of caution is in order. Wikipedia has a policy on the use of reliable sources, and specifically a general prohibition on self-published sources. The mdroads.com website is self-published website, which means we can't use it as a source for our articles in most cases.

Also, there are multiple editors who contribute to the writing of Wikipedia articles, so there isn't one "author" involved. You can see all of the people who have contributed to this article at this link, which is the on the on "View history" tab at the top of the article. Imzadi 1979 → 22:31, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Interstate 97/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 14:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

I'll review this one over the next few days. --Coemgenus (talk) 14:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Checklist

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

Images

• All look fine, appropriate use and licenses.

General points

• The main text is all good. I worked hard to find something to fix, but came up empty--clearly, you've done this before!
• The only think I might add, if it can be found, is an explanation of why there is an interstate highway that only goes through one state. I know it happens in at least one other case (I-99), but the average reader might find it odd. But that's not enough to stand in the way of promotion, so I'll pass this now anyway. Nice work! --Coemgenus (talk) 16:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 97. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121025170746/http://www.baltometro.org/reports/Major%20Transp%20Milestones%20Since%201940.pdf to http://www.baltometro.org/reports/Major%20Transp%20Milestones%20Since%201940.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)