Talk:Intraoperative radiation therapy
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Intraoperative radiation therapy.
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
A summary of this article appears in Radiation therapy. |
comment
editIt seems to me "inoperative tumours" must be a slip of the tongue / keyboard for "inoperable tumours", but don't feel qualified to make the change. Awien 23:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Merge proposal
editI am not an expert, but it looks to me as if this stub is about the same subject as TARGIT. As TARGIT is the newer article, I propose that its content be merged into this article. – ukexpat (talk) 20:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm the author of the TARGIT page, and considered your suggestion. There are several ways to deliver radiotherapy intra-operatively; TARGIT is just one of these. It might be better if the other modalities had their own pages, all linking to this page. Norman21 (talk) 21:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
proposal to merge radiation therapy into this article
editThat's what it says in radiation therapy but they probably meant the other way around. I oppose both as merge will make it hard to maintain IORT content. - Rod57 (talk) 13:53, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
It's possible they meant to merge that section in RT into this article - that makes more sense as there seems too much detail on IORT in RT. - Rod57 (talk) 14:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC)