Talk:Intuitor
 | This article was nominated for deletion on January 15, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
Discussion of article's notability
editI feel this article should not be deleted, this person came up with the idea of hexadecimal time. I feel it's a valid form of time. If anything the most this should be is a stub of hexadecimal time, with out this article there would be no up to date information on hexadecimal time. 142.166.19.53 07:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)Chris Steele
I think this article should be deleted. The statement that "this person came up with the idea of hexadecimal time" isn't true. Hexadecimal time was first proposed at least as far back as 1863. The statement that "with out this article there would be no up to date information on hexadecimal time" is also equally false, as an entire Wikipedia article is dedicated to it and features far more relevant information than is present in this one.
Even outside of that, I can find no justifiably good indication or source for why Intuitor--cool and neat though it may be-- should be considered notable enough to have its own Wiki article. MechanoidWarhead (talk) 05:42, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Sources from AfD
edit"Insultingly Stupid Movie Physics" has been covered on All Things Considered ([1]), referenced by BBC News ([2]), and recognized by PC Magazine ([3]). Tim Smith 02:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)