@Shellypls, @DuncanHill, @Gog the Mild Shouldn't this be merged into Bulgarian occupation of Serbia (World War I)? Aeengath (talk) 13:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I don't off hand see why. There is more than enough material to support a separate article. Eg, as with Battle of France and German military administration in occupied France during World War II and many others. I was surprised that the invasion did not already have its own article. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- At least move to "Bulgarian invasion of Serbia" or "Bulgarian invasion of Serbia (1915)" if disambiguation is necessary. (t · c) buidhe 14:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- @Gog the Mild It's not really comparable to France during WWII, as there isn't nearly as much literature on the subject. So far, I only see material that already exists, with sections that almost mirror each other: Macedonia, a Serbian and Bulgarian issue vs Bulgaria war aims / Bulgarian intervention vs Invasion of Serbia / Bulgarian policy in Serbia vs Bulgarian hegemony / Ethnic cleansing policy vs System of occupation / Counter-insurgency operations vs Resistance and repression / Liberation and aftermath vs Liberation of Bulgarian-occupied Serbian territory...etc Aeengath (talk) 16:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- IMO there is sufficient for a stand alone article. Whether either could be improved and/or have additional sources cited is a separate issue. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Ok thank you for your input. Aeengath (talk) 17:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply