Talk:Inverse-variance weighting
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Confusing symbols in the Multivariate case section
editThe notation used in the section on the multivariate case is quite confusing, in the that the is used to indicate both a sum and a covariance matrix. Additionally, the symbol is used to denote a covariance matrix, whereas in the rest of the article is used to mean variance.
I have boldly edited the equations to use the more common symbol for covariance matrices. The older formulae are retained below.
of the individual estimates :
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glopk (talk • contribs) 16:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Derivation from maximum likelihood?
editLet there be a set of measurements , each with uncertainty , of a variable . A "gaussian" probability distribution function of with respect to each measurment is:
The log-likelihood of given the measurements, ( could be multiplied with -1, doesn't matter):
Finding that maximizes likelihood should give the "best" estimator of the weighted-mean of the values, taking the uncertainties into account:
So then, from the above the "best" is:
Decomposing the variance of , we get: