Talk:Invisible String/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 19:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I will complete this review within one week.

One issue I immediately see is ref. 42 (ARIA Charts – Accreditations – 2024 Singles) is missing a URL in the citation. -Riley1012 (talk) 19:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Hey @Riley1012! I will take over this GAN as per the nominator's request in my talk page. Gained (talk) 12:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for taking it over!

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

• ...and the United Kingdom, where it received a silver certfication. certification is misspelled.
• In a premise for Folklore that Swift posted onto her social media... switch "onto" to "on"
• ..."Invisible String" employs an autobiographical songwriting... remove the word "an"

2. Verifiable
Earwig's Copyvio check shows similarities between the article and other websites because of the song quotes used, but the actual prose of the article does not appear to be copied from another source. The references are reliable, and there are no unsourced claims.

• Spot check:

• No issues: 1, 3, 8, 11, 14, 16, 18, 23, 29, 31, 32, 35, 38, 41

3. Broad
The article is broad and focused in its coverage.

4. Neutral
The article is neutral in its coverage of the song.

5. Stable
This article is stable day-to-day.

6. Illustrated
The image in this article is free to use and has a relevant caption. The audio file is fair use and has a relevant caption.

The CS1 error mentioned above has already been addressed. All that is left to be corrected are a few minor prose issues, which I can do myself. I will go ahead and pass this article, well done @Ippantekina and @Gained! -Riley1012 (talk) 18:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.