Talk:Iore/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ealdgyth - Talk 16:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• Looks fine. I did a light copyedit, and saw nothing else that would hold up GA status. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:44, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Thanks for taking the time for the review :) Arsenikk ^(talk) 23:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)