This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 16:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Not sure how the Template:Asia in topic is related to this since that template doesn't have a link to this, but if there is such a problem, the template should be fixed rather than renaming the article. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 07:40, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Iran Standard Time → Time in Iran — Use old name which was used by User:Tobias Conradi, otherwise Template:Asia in topic is broken. TimeCurrency (talk) 19:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- Strong oppose This is not about time in Iran, it's about Iran's timezone. I see nothing about solar time, traditional methods of dating, Zoroastrian calendar in this article. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 08:18, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - per 70.29.210.242; this article is congruent with Eastern Standard Time or Coordinated Universal Time. Parsecboy (talk) 16:39, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Coherence
editI do not find the second paragraph in the introduction section really relevant to this article: "Between 2005 and 2008, by decree of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran did not observe daylight saving time (called Iran Daylight Time or IRDT).[1][2] It was reintroduced from 21 March 2008."
This text looked to be highly relevant back then when this rule was applied (during the years 2005->2008), but at the moment it looks more like a piece of news or historical information which is not cohesive with the main text of this article anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkiaeeha (talk • contribs) 16:35, 9 December 2015 (UTC)