Talk:Iraq Freedom Congress

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified
  • Marked the article for neutrality concerns. Most of the sources and claims in the article come from the organization itself, which is neither reliable nor verifiable when their website offers no evidence or sources of its own. There is also a rather serious insinuation that the US military was involved in an assassination, despite no reputable source to back it up. The White Tiger Leb (talk) 08:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notability

edit

It seems that the references here are all either a) dead links, b) sources of questionable independence / reliability or c) passing mentions of the existence of the organization with little substance. Unless I have overlooked a few key sources buried in the list, that would mean this article should be deleted. If the allegations of human rights violations in the article are true (which I have no reason to doubt), it is completely outrageous that they have not been documented, but nonetheless, I do think the Wikipedia guidelines for notability should be applied. --Brian Z (talk) 04:40, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Iraq Freedom Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)Reply