Talk:Ireland and the International Monetary Fund

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pckoenig. Peer reviewers: Akhall.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled

This is Pauls talk page Pckoenig (talk) 08:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC) Paul Koenig

The facts written are neutral and have clear identifiable sources present. All facts stated are objective, and do relate to the IMF in Ireland.Aravedis (talk) 23:00, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

I would recommend expanding a bit on the Irish peoples perspective of the IMF. Since in your memo you stated that there is some contempt for the restraints placed by the IMF, and that position is underrepresented in this article.Aravedis (talk) 23:00, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your sources for IMF in Ireland are reliable and apparent the citation links work. I did not notice any plagiarism, and all reference are properly cited. You exceed the minimum requirement of 6 sources, having 8. The formatting is appropriate, and language is clear and concise. However, according to the rubric you need at least two sources per paragraph, and paragraph two only has one source.Aravedis (talk) 23:00, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Varun's Review - Add information about how much they contribute in quotas. - Instead of recently, cite specific dates. You could instead say "Recently, as of 2017,....." - In general try to make your sentences less wordy and to the point. People typically go on Wikipedia for the facts and there is little point in making things overly wordy. - Talk about old issues as well as new ones. - Overall, you have good information and sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varunjitsingh6410 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 10 June 2017 (UTC) •Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? •Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? - Is there anything that distracted you? •Is the article neutral with neutral sources? - Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? •Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? • Do the citation links work? - Is there plagiarism in the article? •Is any information out of date? - Is anything missing that could be added? Varunjitsingh6410 (talk)varunjitsingh6410 —Preceding undated comment added 02:39, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Andrea's Review [THIS IS NOT LATE- SEE EMAIL TO PROFESSOR BERGMAN- SOMEHOW THE ORIGINAL PEER EDIT PAGE GOT DELETED]** --Akhall (talk) 01:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC) The article is relevant to the article topic with a neutral tone and supporting facts. The citation links work and there are more than 6 sources (9 total). Additionally, the sources are reliable sources (many from IMF.org). I would suggest perhaps using sources outside of IMF.org as this may bias the article. Additionally in this sentence, "Ireland Received a sum total of 22.5 billion euros which was meant to fund programs aimed to restore banking system back to health, and reduce deficit and public debt. [4]" I would put the letter "r" in "Received" in lowercase.