Talk:Irenaios of Jerusalem

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 126.161.138.126 in topic Article biased towards Irenaios

The Brotherhood

edit

As far as the Brotherhood is concerned we only require the legal approval of the King of Jordan--fathermaximos 17:03, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

Article biased towards Irenaios

edit

This article is clearly biased and has been written by the supporters of Irenaios. Please restore objectivity and cover both sides of the issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.178.191.29 (talk) 17:37, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Indeed, very much so. Many 'controversial' statements by Irenaios (such as calling his critics worms) have also been purged. It wouldn't surprise me one bit if the whitewashers' IPs resolved to his or one of his stooges' offices. 212.152.70.12 (talk) 11:42, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your wording is suspect. The article is biased towards the benefactors of his misdeeds. Those (Ateret Cohamin) are to be mentioned in a court ruling in the very near future because the same tricks used with Irenaios have been used in Silwan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.161.138.126 (talk) 01:15, 18 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Anything about him BUT scandals?

edit

This article seems heavily slanted against Irenaios. Could it possibly mention anything about him but the two scandals? His birth, education and circumstances of his elevation? Significant acts and what he was known for? Seriously, all we have here is a list of his alleged crimes. Pstanton 08:42, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

edit

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Patriarch Irenaios. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply