Talk:Irene Curzon, 2nd Baroness Ravensdale

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

hi, just wanted to point out that the book cover image currently shown on this page shows irene curzon's sister, baba (alexandra) and not irene. there is another edition of the book that shows all three women...perhaps someone could locate it and replace the current image?18.173.1.81 20:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Titles?

edit

So, the title of her life peerage was the same as that of her hereditary peerage? Would her full title have been "Irene Curzon, 2nd Baroness Ravensdale, Baroness Ravendale" or something? --Jfruh (talk) 16:50, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, although ordinals (the numbers ie. 2nd) aren't official, so she would've been The Rt. Hon. the Baroness Ravensdale and Ravensdale I think. Funnily enough Andrew Turek wrote an article entitle Ladies for life, or who sits where?, which gives a rather good reasoning for female life peers created before the 1963 Act being created hereditary peeresses by virtue of Coke's doctrine of barony by writ; but that's an aside! --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 19:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Irene Curzon, 2nd Baroness Ravensdale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply